ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY ON SIMILARITY MATERIAL VIEWED FROM POLYA’S STAGES AND METACOGNITIVE PROCESSES

  • Maria Sindi Klaudia Anu Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang, Kota Kupang, 85211, Indonesia
  • Kristoforus Djawa Djong Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang, Kota Kupang, 85211, Indonesia
  • Yerum Lapaidemang Matematika, SMPN 6 Kupang Tengah, Kabupaten Kupang, 85361, Indonesia
Keywords: Metacognition, Polya, Problem Solving, Similarity, Student Ability

Abstract

. This study aims to analyze students' mathematical problem-solving abilities on similarity material based on Polya’s stages and supported by metacognitive processes. This descriptive qualitative study involved three seventh-grade students at UPTD SMPN 6 Kupang Tengah selected purposively based on ability levels: high (SKT), medium (SKS), and low (SKR). Data were collected through mathematical problem-solving tests and semi-structured interviews. The results show that high-ability students (SKT) successfully completed all stages of Polya’s problem-solving steps while demonstrating strong metacognitive regulation, including planning, monitoring, and evaluating their strategies. Medium-ability students (SKS) were able to understand the problem and plan a solution but exhibited weak monitoring and evaluation, leading to errors in executing strategies. Low-ability students (SKR) showed limited conceptual understanding and minimal metacognitive awareness, resulting in difficulties in planning, executing, and reviewing their solutions. These findings highlight that differences in students’ problem-solving performance are strongly influenced by their metacognitive skills and conceptual understanding of proportional relationships. The study emphasizes the need for learning designs that strengthen metacognitive processes and apply differentiated instructional strategies to accommodate students' varying abilities.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Damayanti, N., & Kartini, K. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA pada Materi Barisan dan Deret Geometri. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v11i1.1162

Fadilah, R., & Bernard, M. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Kontekstual Materi Kekongruenan Dan Kesebangunan. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 4(4), 817–826. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i4.817-826

Hardianti, A., Yusuf, Y., & Koswara, U. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Melalui Model Guided Discovery Learning Berbantuan Software Geogebra pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 4(1), 151–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v4i1.2658

Novitasari, & Wilujeng, H. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 10 Tangerang. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v2i2.461

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. In OECD: Vol. I. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Purnomo, E. A., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Junaedi, I., & Agoestanto, A. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Calon Guru Ditinjau dari Metakognitif pada Materi Kalkulus Diferensial. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES, 5(1), 310–311.

Purwaningsih, S. W., & Marlina, R. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas VII pada Materi Bentuk Aljabar. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 5(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i3.639-648

Putra, F. P., & Nurqolbu, A. (2021). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa pada Materi Dimensi Tiga di Kelas XII MA. Borneo Jornal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 113–123.

Rahmah, M., Oktaviani, I. P., & Ermawati, D. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Materi Pengukuran Pada Siswa Kelas III Di SD Negeri Langgenharjo 01. Algoritma : Jurnal Matematika, Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Kebumian Dan Angkasa, 2(5), 155–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62383/algoritma.v2i5.183

Rohmahh, D. I., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2022). Analisis Kegagalan Siswa Sma Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Materi Kesebangunan. MATHEdunesa, 11(3), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n3.p765-778

Sabrina, K. A., & Effendi, K. N. S. (2022). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Pada Materi Kesebangunan. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(1), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i1.1969

Sari, S. N. L., Margareta, B., & Jariyah, I. A. (2024). Peningkatan Kemampuan Metakognitif untuk Pengembangan Problem Solving Siswa Melalui Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 13(10), 2056–2066. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v13i10.87044

Setiawan, Y. U., Yandari, I. A. V., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2020). Pengembangan Kartu Domino Pecahan Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Matematika di Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Primary : Jurnal Keilmuan Dan Kependidikan Dasar, 12(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.32678/primary.v12i01.2706

Siagian, A. D., Pangaribuan, F., & Purba, Y. O. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas IX SMP N 7 Pematangsiantar Pada Materi Kekongruenan dan Kesebangunan. 4, 7423–7429.

Sumartini, T. S. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v5i2.270

Yunianta, T. N. H., & Meiwijayanti, D. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pengukuran Geometri Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent-Field Independent. Sigma Didaktika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/sigmadidaktika.v11i1.55652

Zulfikar, R. N. (2019). Pengaruh Pendekatan Metakognitif Terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika SMK Kesehatan Nusantara Kupang. Jurnal Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika), 1(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v1i2.153

Published
2025-11-30